Doing Away with Inequality in Loss of Enjoyment of Life

Giovanni Comandé


The aim of this paper is to show the benefits and viability for the US of experimenting in awarding methods for non-pecuniary losses in light of European experiences. A comparison of innovative methods illustrates that the use of “European style” guidelines would help the review process while safeguarding the jury’s independence and enabling the court to consider the legitimate evidential factors that evoked the specific jury verdict. A better understanding of non-US solutions would at least bring more consistency in striving for individual justice and retaining judicial “discretion”.

Full Text:



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License

Open Access© 2012 Lider-Lab Scuola Superiore S.Anna
Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Italy License. This is an Open Access journal.